• CDI Client Library
  • Imprint
  • Privacy
  • English English English en
  • Deutsch Deutsch German de
Give us a call: +49 2405 4547938
  • Home
  • Our
    Way
  • Our
    Services
    • Effective Governance
    • Operational Efficiency
  • Our
    Results
  • Our
    team
    • Alan Thomson
    • Anthony D. Harvey
    • Gudrun Timm
    • Armin Krauter
  • Reading
  • Contact
  • Callback
  • Menu Menu

Four Steps To Minimize The Risk Of Top Management Failing

Sharing some new techniques to help focus down on the leadership competencies that management must have to achieve success with the business plan’s ‘Must-Win-Battles’, and for you, to reduce surprises and the risk of churn at the top.

Just so you know where we are coming from

We have spent the last 25 years working hands-on with over 300 companies delivering programs to help them grow their business and improve their bottom line. And in doing this we are almost always reminded of that pearl of wisdom I first heard from Michael Hammer, the corporate re-engineering guru, that if you don’t have the right leadership from the top management team 70% of your efforts to grow and transform the business will fail. It is the ‘quality’ of top management that drives change, delivers the results, and makes sure that improvements stick.

A couple of years back we started to see some quantifiable data that proved that point. Hay, Sorbonne, BCG and others started publishing survey information gathered from Shareholders and Investors as companies changed ownership, and over 80% of them said that the quality of management was by far the single biggest factor that added shareholder value to the enterprises they were investing in. They also disclosed that within the first two years of executing the business plan, over 60% of top managers in the team were changed out, and this constituted a major risk in reaching the targets.

There must be a better way
So all the profiled head-hunting, organisational due diligence and management assessments are just not often and reliably enough identifying the traits that are needed for the future. The current accelerated churn in the C-suite is a symptom that we are not understanding managers’ capabilities versus the goals.

Past great performance accepted, companies are challenged to do something new, and this requires the leaders to be capable of outstanding new performance that delivers and exceeds expectations – because that is what Shareholders and Boards are really looking for from management.

Step one – look forwards not backwards
Our own experience on the job lead us to re-examine the way ‘quality management for the future’ was being defined and measured. We developed a new view that put management capability in the framework of what is needed for success, tomorrow, and imbedded this in a systematic approach that could be learnt and used by everyone who has the responsibility to assess managements’ capability to achieve ‘the plan’.

Step two – understand the must win battles
Not surprisingly the seconds step is about having a very clear and precise understanding yourself of what the business plan requires top management to achieve. Amongst all the expectations you have from top management, what are the vital few goals that absolutely must be a success, and without which, the plan will fail. We call these ‘Must-Win-Battles’, and there are usually only very few of these. And if you have more than five then you may need to re-evaluate your strategy. Everyone from Shareholders, Directors, C-Management and key staff must be aware that these are the priorities and their measure of success too.

Step three – what key leadership competencies count?
Now knowing what management must tightly focus on, you can be very specific about what you expect a manager to excel at, and assess whether he has demonstrated this competency in the past, and if not, can you help him or her learn it fast. Given that there are probably only 3-4 must-win-battles, our experience points to a top manager contributing 2-3 competencies to the top team. We use 13 key competencies that seem to cover everything.

Step four – use a common rating yard-stick
We all have chemistry and emotions that filter our view of someone, including ourselves. So it is important when grading a particular manager’s key competency that we get away from the ‘like’ and ‘dislike’ and rate their level of performance on a more quantifiable scale. This can be done by matching descriptions of a specific performance level with what has been observed or demonstrated. This descriptive way enables different people to contribute their observations into a common rating matrix that gets everyone away from ‘well I thought he was a A+’.

Yes, you are right, there are some more steps like –
“now I understand this manager what am I going to do about it’, and
“I can use this approach to profile for my new CFO”.
So if you are interested, click on the link below to get some more info.

ManagerMax WebOverview 2016 V1

Thank you,
Anthony Harvey, Managing Partner at Carpe Diem International Germany

Blogs

  • Crisis Intervention and Sustainability27. March 2020 - 17:34
  • PE is Already Driving Towards the Digital Future14. November 2019 - 14:56
  • Sustainable Investment – Why and when are we getting more radical in our asset allocation?11. November 2019 - 10:44
  • The Business Case for Digitizing Processes25. October 2019 - 14:56
  • Board Observers29. September 2016 - 15:34
  • Getting an early view of management quality26. June 2017 - 11:25
  • Newsletter26. January 2017 - 11:37
  • Board Composition – Three considerations for putting your board together4. August 2016 - 11:11
  • Leadership Development puts people centre stage7. June 2016 - 18:40
  • Four Steps To Minimize The Risk Of Top Management Failing7. June 2016 - 8:12

Readings

  • Viewpoint: New Management Skills Needed Post-Corona27. April 2020 - 13:37
  • Mariana Mazzucato: The Value of Everything27. March 2020 - 21:38
  • A Must Read for Modern Management: Reinventing Organizations5. November 2019 - 11:46
  • Artikel: Warum ist Mensch sein zurzeit eigentlich so anstrengend?22. August 2019 - 9:24
  • Recommended Book: A Brief History of Humankind22. August 2019 - 9:22
yes - load Google Maps

Carpe Diem Partners Ltd.

10/11, The Old Glove Factory
Bristol Road
Sherborne
Dorset DT9 4HP, U.K.
T: +44 1935 816 364
F: +44 1935 815 726
info@carpe-diem-consulting.com

yes - load Google Maps

Carpe Diem Consulting GmbH

Ravelsberger Strasse 24
D-52146 Würselen
T: +49 2405 4547938
F: +49 2405 478 8362
M: +49 171 212 6617
aharvey@carpe-diem-consulting.com

yes - load Google Maps

Pacific Consult Shanghai Representative Office

21J, Huadu Mansion
838 Zhangyang Road
Shanghai 200122
People's Republic of China

yes - load Google Maps

Carpe Diem Consulting

Pacific Consult AG
Plöck 60-62
69117 Heidelberg
T: +49 6221 64103
akrauter@carpe-diem-consulting.com

yes - load Google Maps

Carpe Diem Consulting

Godesberger Allee 139
53127 Bonn
T: +49 228 53697042
M: +49 151 70153727
gtimm@carpe-diem-consulting.com

© Copyright - Carpe Diem Consulting GmbH • Ravelsberger Strasse 24 • D-52146 Würselen • Germany

    contact form
    • Contact
    • Privacy
    • Imprint
    Leadership Development puts people centre stage
    Scroll to top